2.3 KiB
UniversalQ
Analysis generated on: 4/2/2025 10:13:09 AM
SQL Statement
SELECT DISTINCTROW Process.*
FROM Process
ORDER BY Left$(Right$(" "+[Process].[PartNumber],5),4), Right$([PartNumber],1) DESC;
Dependencies
Parameters
- None
What it does
SQL Code Description
Overview
The provided SQL code retrieves a distinct set of records from the Process
table, ordered based on two conditions: part number length and its first character.
Breakdown
1. Selecting Distinct Records
SELECT DISTINCTROW Process.*
This line selects all columns (*
) from the Process
table, but only returns distinct records. The DISTINCTROW
keyword ensures that each row in the result set is unique based on the specified column(s).
2. Sorting Criteria
The sorting criteria for this query are:
- Part number length (first 5 characters) in descending order
- First character of part number in ascending order
These conditions are applied using string manipulation functions (Left
and Right
) and comparisons (ORDER BY
clause).
3. String Manipulation Functions
LEFT$([PartNumber],4)
This function extracts the first 4 characters from the PartNumber
. The $
symbol denotes a "literal" string, which means the result is treated as a literal value rather than being interpreted by SQL.
RIGHT$(" "+[Process].[PartNumber],1)
This function takes the following steps:
- Concatenates an additional 5 spaces (
" "
) with thePartNumber
. - Extracts the first character from this resulting string using
Right
.
4. ORDER BY Clause
ORDER BY Left$([PartNumber],5), Right$([PartNumber],1) DESC;
The results are sorted according to the two conditions mentioned earlier:
- Part number length (first 5 characters): shorter lengths come first.
- First character of part number: alphabetical order from A to Z.
Both conditions are applied in descending order, meaning records with longer part numbers and starting letters that appear later alphabetically will be prioritized.
Result
The query returns a list of distinct Process
records sorted according to the specified criteria. The resulting set may have fewer rows than the original table if duplicate records were present.