# AddnlQ1 Analysis generated on: 4/2/2025 9:56:48 AM --- ## SQL Statement ```sql SELECT DISTINCTROW AddnlProc.PartNumber, AddnlProc.OPCode, AddnlProc.ID, AddnlProc.Generated, AddnlProc.Description, AddnlProc.WC1, AddnlProc.WC2, AddnlProc.WC3, AddnlProc.WC4, AddnlProc.Machine, AddnlProc.CycleTime, AddnlProc.RunStd, Labor.LaborRate FROM AddnlProc INNER JOIN Labor ON AddnlProc.WC2 = Labor.WC2 ORDER BY AddnlProc.PartNumber, AddnlProc.OPCode, AddnlProc.ID; ``` ## Dependencies - [[Tables/AddnlProc]] - [[Tables/Labor]] ## Parameters - *None* ## What it does **SQL Query Description** ===================================== ### Overview This SQL query retrieves a distinct set of rows from two tables: `AddnlProc` and `Labor`. The query joins the two tables on a common column (`WC2`) and returns various columns, grouped by specific criteria. ### Query Breakdown #### SELECT Clause The query starts with the `SELECT DISTINCTROW` statement, which specifies that only distinct rows should be returned. However, this clause seems redundant in combination with `DISTINCTROW`, as `DISTINCTROW` already ensures that each row is unique based on its values. For simplicity and consistency, it's recommended to use just `DISTINCT`. The query selects the following columns from both tables: - `AddnlProc.PartNumber` - `AddnlProc.OPCode` - `AddnlProc.ID` - `AddnlProc.Generated` - `AddnlProc.Description` - `AddnlProc.WC1`, `AddnlProc.WC2`, and `AddnlProc.WC3` columns from the `AddnlProc` table - `Labor.LaborRate` #### INNER JOIN Clause The query joins the `AddnlProc` table with the `Labor` table on a common column (`WC2`). This creates a new table that combines rows from both tables where the value in `WC2` is the same. #### ORDER BY Clause Finally, the query sorts the resulting combined table by the following columns: - `AddnlProc.PartNumber` - `AddnlProc.OPCode` - `AddnlProc.ID` This ensures that the results are presented in a consistent order. ### Potential Improvements 1. **Use `DISTINCT` instead of `DISTINCTROW`:** While `DISTINCTROW` provides some benefits, using `DISTINCT` alone is sufficient and more straightforward. 2. **Consider indexing:** If the join operation frequently uses the same columns for sorting (as in this query), creating an index on these columns could improve performance. ### Example Output | PartNumber | OPCode | ID | Generated | Description | WC1 | WC2 | WC3 | Machine | CycleTime | RunStd | LaborRate | |------------|--------|----|-----------|-------------|-----|------|------|----------|---------|-------|----------| Assuming the `WC2` value in each row is unique, this query would return one row per combination of values from these columns. If there are duplicate rows for a specific set of values (e.g., same part number and operation code), only one will be included in the results.